One is a jihadist movement that seeks global dominance, beheading journalists, throwing gay people off of rooftops and massacring any perceived foe which crosses its path on the way to restoring a grand Islamic state.
The other is a sovereign state, a refuge for a people repeatedly targeted for annihilation throughout history. It also provides medical treatment for Syrians who have been victims of attacks from Islamic State terrorists and the Assad regime.
Fighting for each apparently poses an equal threat. So says Hussam Ayloush, the Council on American-Islamic Relations' (CAIR) Los Angeles director. Speaking about efforts to "counter violent extremism" at the Islamic Center of Orange County last month, Ayloush said he resented the focus placed on the Muslim community:
You know, you don't hear about countering violent extremism to deal with the thousands of Jewish-American kids who join the Israeli army killing the people of Gaza. When was the last time the DHS – the Dept. of Homeland Security – or the FBI approached the Jewish community to ask them to deal with this trend? Actually, there are many more Jewish Americans who have joined the Israeli army than there are Muslim Americans who join ISIS.
So let's talk about the Jewish American kids who join the Jewish State before we talk about Muslim Americans who join the Islamic State. Neither one represents Judaism or Islam.
Ayloush's comments were made during a forum on Jan. 9, the same day the terrorist siege of Paris ended in police assaults. They were recorded by Gary Fouse, a University of California, Irvine adjunct professor who wrote about them on his blog.
So less than a day after Amedy Coulibaly stormed a kosher supermarket in Paris killing four people, Ayloush argued American Jews who move to Israel and join its army are just as bad as the marauding terrorists of ISIS. A video released after the attack shows Coulibaly pledging allegiance to ISIS.
Ayloush wasn't the first to make the comparison. Zahra Billoo, Ayloush's colleague from CAIR's San Francisco office, took to Twitter Sept. 15, saying she "wonders who has recruited more Americans? The IDF or ISIS?"
Updated Feb. 19: Give Billoo credit for consistency. She repeated the meme equating ISIS and the IDF in a Feb. 16 Twitter post, asking, "Is one genocidal group different than the other?"
During last summer's Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) convention in Detroit, Billoo spoke with lament about Israel's Iron Dome missile defense system, which shot down dozens of rockets indiscriminately fired by Hamas and other terrorists at civilian population centers. "In the Bay Area where we have some of the most progressive elected officials imaginable in the entire United States, we have only one elected official who voted against the Iron Dome missile defense system," she said.
Yes, if only Iron Dome hadn't been funded and more Israelis could have died.
What makes otherwise intelligent people say such things?
How does one equate a functioning democratic state, one which routinely warns people to vacate an area before an airstrike, in which its Arab citizens have greater individual rights to choose their representatives than most of the Muslim world, with a death cult that seems to work overtime to kill in the most shocking and depraved ways imaginable?
The Jerusalem Post profiled one American who moved to Israel and joined the IDF. Take a look at this guy, read his story and see if he sends chills of fear across the West.
Ayloush is no fringe player. A day after equating Americans joining ISIS with those who fight in the Israeli army, he announced his election to the California Democratic Party's District 60 executive board.
When he made his ISIS/IDF comparison, Ayloush must have forgotten the tirade he launched into back in November 2013. Asked to condemn Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups, Ayloush angrily rejected the question as out of bounds. CAIR is a civil rights group, he said, and "we're not here in the business of being dragged into the Middle East affairs and the conflicts of the Middle East. We are an American organization."
The question "proves that you have nothing but bigotry in you."
Expecting someone to condemn Hamas and Hizballah terror is out of bounds. Making a moral equivalency between the Islamic State and Israel? To Ayloush, that's just righteous analysis.
The same goes for former New York Times foreign correspondent Chris Hedges, who advanced the ISIS=IDF nonsense in a December article. Arguing that ISIS is an American-created Frankenstein resulting from the U.S. invasion of Iraq, he likened its "quest for an ethnically pure Sunni state" to the Jewish desire to create a homeland.
ISIS "tactics are much like those of the Jewish guerrillas who used violence, terrorism, foreign fighters, clandestine arms shipments and foreign money, along with horrific ethnic cleansing and the massacre of hundreds of Arab civilians, to create Israel."
The meme dates back at least to last summer, when Israel sent ground troops into Gaza in an attempt to wipe out Hamas' ability to continue its rocket fire at civilian population centers. During December's "Reviving the Islamic Spirit" conference in Toronto, Omar Suleiman tried to explain the rage that drives young Muslims into the arms of Nigeria's Islamist terrorist group Boko Haram and to ISIS. Part of that rage, he claimed, was a perception that true evil was not being condemned sufficiently.
"So it's important for leadership altogether to be able to take a clear stance, because if they don't, then what does that do to the people? As Imam Zaid said at ISNA, it's easy to condemn ISIS, all of us condemn ISIS, but what about the IDF? Where are we on the IDF?
...And if you don't think that Zionism, this evil curse of Zionism, is the central issue for which the Middle East is being played with, for which these puppet governments are being put in place, then you're blind."
Someone is blind, all right. The "evil curse of Zionism" didn't send French citizens to slaughter cartoonists and editors, or to attack a Jewish market last month. It didn't prompt Boko Haram to massacre 2,000 people, mostly women, children and the elderly, in one town. It had nothing to do with ISIS gunning down 600 Shia prison inmates near Mosul last summer, or with the murder of more than 200 Iraqi Sunnis who sided with the government.
But with Israel-obsessed Islamists, everything points back to Jerusalem.
A telling list of heroes
The same people drawing this false equivalence rally behind people who aid terrorist killers, or in at least one case, killed people in a terrorist act.
As we showed last fall, Rasmieh Odeh played a significant role in a 1969 supermarket bombing in Jerusalem that killed two college students. She deliberately withheld information about her conviction in that attack from immigration officials when she came to the United States in 1995 and when she successfully applied to become an American citizen in 2004.
Odeh's prosecution for immigration fraud triggered a national campaign aimed at pressuring the government to drop the case. It was led by friends at the Arab American Action Network (AAAN), and garnered support from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), American Muslims for Palestine (AMP), the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee, and even a group of 124 feminist academics.
Earlier this month, many of those same groups criticized the deportation of Sami Al-Arian, a former tenured professor at the University of South Florida who secretly served as a member of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad's board of directors. He left for Turkey last Wednesday after agreeing in a 2006 plea agreement to be deported for conspiring to provide services to the terrorist group.
Writing for Al Jazeera, college lecturer Hatem Bazian said the case "in essence boils down to free speech and an Arabic statement he is reported to have uttered in an anti-Israel rally in 1988, which translates to something like 'Death to Israel'."
That's a gross mischaracterization that ignores Al-Arian's own plea agreement, in which he acknowledged his association with the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and his own knowledge that his colleagues at a Tampa-based think tank he created – Ramadan Shallah, Basheer Nafi and his brother-in-law Mazen al-Najjar – also were part of the terrorist group. Shallah has been the Islamic Jihad's leader since 1995, assuming command mere months after leaving Al-Arian's base in Tampa.
Bazian's assertion ignores evidence showing Al-Arian was an officer on the PIJ board and that he solicited "true support of the jihad movement in Palestine" in the wake of a 1995 double suicide bombing that killed more than 20 people "so that operations such as these can continue."
To Bazian, the Al-Arian case proves that "[t]he 'war on terrorism' in the U.S. and for sure Canada has translated into a targeting campaign against Palestinian activists and affiliated organisations..."
This misinformation isn't from some random crank trolling Internet chat rooms. He's an academic, lecturing at the University of California, Berkeley, and helping run the school's Islamophobia Research and Documentation Project.
Bazian, like Al-Arian's other supporters, offers no indication he's interested in the documentation which cements the former professor's PIJ connections. Israel is the real terrorist. End of story.
On the flip side, genuine heroes can be cast aside by Islamists if they commit the unpardonable sin of siding with Israel over anything. U.S. Rep. John Lewis, a Freedom Rider who repeatedly risked life and limb during the Civil Rights Movement, has repeated drawn scorn from CAIR-Michigan's Dawud Walid.
Because Walid doesn't like Lewis' support for Israel, one of the leading voices of nonviolence in this country's history has "lost his moral compass."
Bad on details
At the American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) conference in Chicago last November, the group's vice chairman, Munjed Ahmad, won applause when he noted aid to Hamas and other designated terrorist groups is illegal, but "what's very sad to me, when we talk about terrorist organizations, is that the State of Israel is not considered a terrorist organization with our government but it truly is the largest terrorist of all. Truly."
A few minutes earlier, he wondered why the United States "has never sided with the right of self-determination. In fact, they've done exactly the opposite. They've sided with the most oppressive regime, in my opinion, in the world right now. They've aided, supported financed arms, provided diplomatic cover for, and perpetuated the brutal occupation against the Palestinian people."
The most oppressive regime in the world? It has an independent judiciary and a vibrant free press. Worse than North Korea under Kim Jong Un? Worse than Syria under Bashar al-Assad? Worse than Saudi Arabia, which publicly beheads criminals and sentences a man to 1,000 lashes for expressing free thoughts? Worse than Iran, which sent its proxy army Hizballah into Syria to prop up Assad and is arresting academics, journalists and others?
Ahmed may dislike Israel more than any other country, but there is no objective measure that comes close to validating such an absurd view of the world.
Despite his assertion, the United States has advocated for a Palestinian state at least since President Carter was in office nearly 40 years ago. But in making the call for a Palestinian homeland, Carter said that Palestinians had "never yet given up their publicly professed commitment to destroy Israel. That has to be overcome."
What U.S. designated terrorist groups Hamas and PIJ share is their ongoing commitment to Israel's destruction which is spelled out in their respective charters. None of the people who call Israel a terrorist state, who liken it to ISIS, have called for those charters to be amended or nullified.
Instead, they condemn law enforcement for enforcing laws. If a prosecution targeted people or groups suspected of providing material support to Palestinian terrorist groups, Islamists condemned it as an outrage.
"The purpose of creating the Holy Land Foundation was as a fundraising arm for Hamas," U.S. District Judge Jorge Solis said during a 2009 sentencing hearing for five former charity officials. Evidence showed that the foundation, known as HLF, was part of a broad Muslim Brotherhood conspiracy in the United States to serve Hamas with "media, money and men." Those exhibits show the depth of Muslim Brotherhood activity here, which at its height included a think tank in Virginia, a propaganda arm in Texas and Chicago, and CAIR itself.
That's what prompted the FBI to cut off any non-investigative interaction with CAIR "until we can resolve whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and HAMAS."
CAIR's Zahra Billoo, who sees the IDF and ISIS as similar threats, called the HLF convicts and Al-Arian her "personal heroes" in a November Twitter post.
That's her right. But the courts have found her heroes to be criminals tied to terrorist groups. And that says something about the motivation behind so many Islamists who, despite all evidence to the contrary, see Israel as the world's greatest danger.