Muslims Target Tariq Ramadan, Brotherhood
by IPT News • Apr 16, 2010 at 4:46 pm
http://www.investigativeproject.org/1908/muslims-target-tariq-ramadan-brotherhood
A group of moderate Muslims on Thursday warned Canadians not to be fooled by Islamist Tariq Ramadan, telling reporters in Montreal that his charisma masks a dark vision of tyranny over Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
Speakers including Zuhdi Jasser, president of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy; Tarek Fatah, founder of the Muslim Canadian Congress; Salim Mansur, a professor at the University of Western Ontario and newspaper columnist; and Danish Parliament member Naser Khader. Rather than the moderate he professes to be, the group agreed Ramadan (who will speak Friday night in Montreal), represents the agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood and its efforts to undermine the fabric of liberal democracy in the West.
At the press conference sponsored by Point de Bascule (an organization working to educate residents of Quebec about the danger posed by Islamism), speakers said Ramadan was behaving deceptively - talking about peace and interfaith dialogue on one hand, while acting like an apologist for terror and raising money for Islamist organizations on the other.
Jasser said that Western elites misconstrue critical issues in the current struggle with radical Islam. They erroneously believe that the most important aspect of the conflict is whether an Islamist organization is violent or nonviolent.
But truly moderate Muslims spend most of their time dealing with the factors that drive people toward radical Islam. And a major factor is "political Islam," which Jasser described as "the 800-pound elephant in the room."
A key component of this consists of making excuses for terrorism and objecting to U.S. defense actions against violent jihadists. Jasser cited an interview during which a reporter asked Ramadan about the recent announcement that the United States would target Anwar al-Awlaki –an Al Qaeda-linked imam who has endorsed terrorist attacks like the Fort Hood massacre and the attempted Christmas Day airliner bombing.
Ramadan voiced objections to U.S. efforts to kill Awlaki, saying the imam felt "estrangement" from mainstream American society and had been "pushed away."
Jasser and Mansur voiced particularly strong objections to this "root cause" argument, saying it was an attempt to make excuses for Awlaki's criminal behavior. Ramadan also accepted money from Iran as compensation for a television show on the regime controlled PRESS Television.
"I would not take remuneration from a government that engages in the oppression of Muslims," Jasser said.
Ramadan stands for "obfuscation and denial" and represents the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood, he added.
Fatah, who also published this column on Ramadan in the Montreal Gazette, blasted the "cowardice of Western society" in refusing to confront efforts to "recreate the world of [Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna, Tariq Ramadan's grandfather] in Canada."
Salim Mansur urged Canadians to read French author Caroline Fourest's book Brother Tariq, which illustrates Ramadan's "double speak." Ramadan is trying to tell Western audiences that it is possible to reconcile Islamism and Sharia with liberal democratic concepts of freedom. Mansur said that is impossible because "we cherish individual rights," while Islamism represents a form of "collectivism" where liberty is subordinated to clerical decree.
Related Topics: Tariq Ramadan | IPT News
Read More: Tariq Ramadan
Reader comments on this item
Massachusetts welcomes Jihadists
Submitted by Nathan R. Jessup, Jun 7, 2010 13:46
Here is the video of Governor Deval Patrick hugging radical Imam Abdullah Faaruuq:
http://the-raw-deal.com/?p=2510
Scary stuff.
NRJ
Amaleki
Submitted by aspacia, Apr 20, 2010 20:29
Any person who preaches terrorism, does not wear a uniform, and attacks civilians to induce terrror needs to be eliminated especially if he or she is a U.S. citizen who refuses trial in the states.
Evidently, September 11, 2001 did not teach many regarding the FACT we are at war.
double standards
Submitted by Lewis, Apr 19, 2010 02:02
@ Karen: Not sure I'm following. Whether or not Tariq Ramadan is actively condemning terrorist activities seems to be beside the point; it is pretty clear, from what is written, that the so-called moderates are using his objection to killing a man as their primary example of his double standards. Moderates and/or reasonable individuals should not be tacitly or implicitly accepting that the attempted assassination of Awlkai is justifiable. Not sure how it detracts at all from my previous comment.
If there should be an active duty on people to condemn any acts, which seems to be the only complaint these moderates have of Tariq Ramadan, then that duty should begin with these moderates codemning the US attempting to kill a man. I'm not sure why people might feel it is more important for a man like Tariq Ramadan to condemn a person like Awlaki, than for these so-called moderates to condemn the actions of the US who are trying to kill a man who has not even been accused of any serious crime (beyond touting anti-American rhetoric)?
double standards
Submitted by Karen de Vries, Apr 18, 2010 01:38
@ Lewis: I think what they mean is that there are double standards. When you condemn the US for planning to kill someone instead of bringing him to justice, why make excusese for - and not condemn terrorists activities, which also kills people without a fair trial?
Moderates?
Submitted by Lewis, Apr 17, 2010 09:43
The so-called 'Moderates' in this article are criticizing a distinguished professor for objecting to a state attempting to kill a man; seems like quite the misnomer to me. First, there is no capital punishment in Canada. Second, even in the US, Awlaki wouldn't be subject to the death penalty for any of the alleged crimes he has committed. Third and most important, any state attempting to assassinate an individual without a fair trial and due process is probably the greatest travesty to democracy and Western civilization.
So it seems these 'Moderates' should check their own ideology when getting caught up in an obviously partisan attack to discredit an individual who they take issue with.
More Reader Comments
| Title | By | Date |
Massachusetts welcomes Jihadists |
Nathan R. Jessup |
|
Amaleki |
aspacia |
|
double standards |
Lewis |
|
double standards |
Karen de Vries |
|
Moderates? |
Lewis |
|
Great efforts |
Shamshad Elahee Ansari |


