![]() |
![]() |
Search IPT Website: |
|
"Mainstream" Islamist Convention Features Hate Speech and Hezbollah Defense
IPT News http://www.investigativeproject.org/1085/mainstream-islamist-convention-features-hate
In her remarks, Senior Advisor for Public Engagement and International Affairs Valerie Jarrett noted she was the first White House official to address ISNA. She spoke in general terms about interfaith dialogue and cooperation. She praised her hosts for "the diversity of American organizations, and ideas that are represented and will be debated" at the convention. And she openly invited ISNA President Ingrid Mattson to work on the White House Council on Women and Girls that Jarrett leads. During her 15-minute remarks Friday, Jarrett briefly echoed the challenge her boss issued in Cairo last month about the changes needed to bring peace between Palestinians and Israelis. "Resistance through violence and killing is wrong and it does not succeed," Obama said in his speech. "Hamas," he added, "must put an end to violence, recognize past agreements, recognize Israel's right to exist." Jarrett was less specific, saying:
That's a significant shift since ISNA is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas-support conspiracy and maintains significant leadership ties to its foundation 28 years ago by members of the Muslim Brotherhood in America. A more pointed statement also would have stood as a powerful retort to extremist sentiments offered in other segments of the conference. While many panels featured criticism of U.S. policy and law enforcement, one stood out for its hate-filled rhetoric, and ISNA officials should have seen it coming a mile away. During a "meet the authors" session, Imam Warith Deen Umar, former head of the New York state prison chaplain program managed to:
Umar's radicalism is no secret. He previously hailed the 9/11 hijackers as martyrs who were secretly admired by Muslims. He has called for violent jihad. In a January 2004 speech, he urged people:
Umar's ISNA appearance Sunday afternoon promoted his latest book, Jews for Salaam: The Straight Path to Global Peace. In discussing it, Umar first thanked ISNA for inviting him to speak. He then described a distinction between "holy Jews," who are devout, apolitical and poor, and "unholy Jews" who are greedy, conniving and all powerful. He looked to the White House for an example (hear the clip here):
ISNA described the author's panel as "an interactive session which provides a wonderful platform to learn, share ideas, and provide literary contributions to society." Remarkably, ISNA included Umar in that platform despite a very public record of anti-Semitism, advocacy for jihad, and praise for the 9/11 hijackers. Umar shared the microphone with another author who did not spew out bigotry, but who did cast Hezbollah as an innocent player subject to incessant Israeli onslaught. Cathy Sultan described her book, Tragedy in South Lebanon: The Israeli/Hezbollah War of 2006, as a history of "the tragedy of the repeated incursions and wars in South Lebanon, the complexities of the Lebanese politics." She made no mention of Iranian funding for Hezbollah or Syrian meddling in Lebanese politics or its suspected involvement in the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. Instead, she lumps Hariri among a list of "docile Arab rulers willing to acquiesce to the West and to Israelis' demands ... provided they eliminate or at least contain and disarm Hamas and Hezbollah." Nor did Sultan describe indiscriminate Hezbollah rocket fire toward Israeli civilian communities, or the cross-border attack on an Israeli army base by Hezbollah that left three soldiers dead and two others kidnapped. In response to a question, Sultan said "Hezbollah still serves a role. I think that Lebanon is still under constant threat from its southern neighbor. And I see nothing wrong, as long as Hezbollah abides by certain rules and regulations; I see no reason why Hezbollah should not remain armed." The United States considers Hezbollah to be a terrorist group, and some experts consider it a bigger potential threat to the United States than Al-Qaeda. The panel did not feature anyone with contrasting viewpoints to challenge Sultan or Umar. The program drew about 50 people, who sat passively during most of the remarks. Umar's books were available for purchase at the convention. Government agencies were represented with booths of their own, including the departments of Justice, State, Homeland Security, Commerce, the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Before the convention started, ISNA posted a statement for vendors which said "Any literature (fundraising or otherwise) is restricted to the assigned booth and must be pre-approved in writing by ISNA, in ISNA's sole and absolute discretion. Book selling vendors must complete enclosed form providing inventory of the literature to be sold at ISNA." Judaiology devotes a chapter to "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," allegedly the minutes of a meeting of Jewish leaders at the first Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland, in 1897, in which they plotted to take over the world. Researchers have definitively proved that the Protocols were in fact forged in Paris sometime between 1895 and 1899 by an agent of the Russian secret police. This has not kept anti-Semitic groups from believing the validity of this forgery. For example, the Charter of Hamas states:
To Umar, however, the Protocols "remain a mystery:"
A woman in the audience reminded Umar that Jews marched with Black people during the Civil Rights movement. But, Umar said, that was not motivated by a genuine desire for justice:
Umar also managed to stray into a reference about same-sex marriage, which he said would prompt God's wrath:
This is the man responsible for the Muslim chaplain program in New York prisons for 20 years. He was forced out of that job after his praise for the 9/11 hijackers became known. This is who ISNA chose to showcase in a "meet the authors" panel and provide an unchallenged platform. "My conclusion is that there should be more jihad," he said. "But people don't want to hear that. They're scared." In Cairo, the President said:
But somehow, partnering with a group that invites the same thing is okay? Related Topics: The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) Reader comments on this itemWho else? Submitted by JH, Jul 19, 2009 18:21 I would be interested in seeing a list of thise Jewish leaders who chose to participate in this gathering. One can understand the hateful rhetoric of Islamofascists; one can understand the political calculations of theObama administration; but how does one explain the groveling of some of our self-proclaimed spokespeople and leaders? Where is their self respect? Or are they all simply delusional?
They rewrite history Submitted by Al Redwood, Jul 18, 2009 10:52 The Obama wrecking crew is rewriting, improvising history as they go along. Facts, research is of no consequence when such an important agenda as healing ht eoceans and curing our air is at stake. None of the so called promises about turth, accountability, open records, government on the internet happened so far. When it comes to National Security, who cares? This two bit hustling jive artist will make us all long for Jimmy Carter. The war on terror was lost before Bush left the White House, with radioactive Leftist agenda-built on lies, manipualtion, and total distortions, it is only a matter of time before we get another 911, because the masters of terror see us as weak, wobbly and utterly mindless.
Have We Lost Our Minds? Submitted by diane, Jul 17, 2009 14:50 It is unthinkable that the Senior Advisor for Public Engagement and International Affairs of the United States of America addressed and thereby endorsed the ISNA convention. Our show of political correctness will be our demise!
anti-Semitic, homophobic rhetoric Submitted by Ray Bell, Jul 17, 2009 14:23 Senior Advisor for Public Engagement and International Affairs Valerie Jarrett was allowed to speak at this anti-Semitic , Hamas-supporting conspiracy group and part of the Muslim Brotherhood..and HAD to have White House blessings and approval to do so. What does this say for our current government? What does this say for our lack of patriotism and national identity? Our constitution gives us freedom of speech, but this garbage is nothing more than vitriolic hate, intolerance, ignorance of history, and repetition of past anti-Semitic forgeries. Why was this ever allowed to occur?? We need to ask Obama!
ISNA conference Submitted by Toni, Jul 14, 2009 16:02 It is a shame that a conference was held and people sat there passively and were silent, that is a disgrace. The mere fact that Umar was allowed to speak and nobody disapproved of his language or virulent anti-semitic cries of indecency toward the Jews and others is an outrage.. where there anybody there who was knowledgeable about the inciteful communication that was allowed to exist at t his conference... and why was there a lack of response from anyone sitting in the audience? Giving the platform to a person with ideas of hatred and misconstrued information only bolsters this persons ability to want to reach out more and express his intolerant views... Why do we keep allowing these people to speak and if they speak, then where is the debate?
More Reader Comments
Comment on this item |
Featured Multimedia
Latest Articles by IPT Most Viewed Most Mailed |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2010 The Investigative Project on Terrorism. | Legal Information |