Radicalisation by authorities.
Reader comment on item: The Boston Bombing and the Case for FBI Stings

Submitted by Tim, May 1, 2013 20:50

I see the gist of the argument within this article is the notion that CAIR explicitly suggests an entrapment process by informants, acting, not as factual collating field agents, but, rather as 'agent provocateurs' deliberately encouraging the radicalisation of certain elements of the Islamic Community within American society. Overall, the aim seems, implicitly, of course, to be a latent attempt by certain Judeao-Christian and secularist Americans in shoring up the 'just cause' for ensuring institutional pariahship stigma of Islamism within American society. In the end, the entrapment process may be interpreted as an assimilatory sociological behaviour engineering design which does have some mainstreaming legitimacy as a long term synopsis for multicultural diffusionism. In the end the radicalisation may be deemed a religious and cultural jihad and the struggle for Islamism survival within an inimical society that is culturally alien to their religious cultural values, ie Sharia laws, etc. The bottomline then, seems to be an argument of cultural acceptance by the host society of these nuanced peculiarities of a multicultural American society; and, conversely, with the resilience of the minority cultural group, in this multicultural context, in accepting the cultural values of a seemingly inimical host society. Only, if they choose to remain as participants within this society and, in so doing, sharing the equal citizenry democratic rights within such a society.

Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.