Reader comments on this item

EO 13224

Submitted by Justin, Mar 27, 2014 17:56

To be fair, the above referenced CAP report stated that EO 13224 sanctions should be considered since it is agreed that IHH supports terrorism. This would be the same designation as that of the "Union of Good" also referenced above. Since the author has described that designation asa terrorist organization by the U.S. Treasury Department, then by the same standards, CAP is also suggesting that IHH be designated as a terorist organization.

Personally, I feel the EO 13224 sanction makes sense as it is written specifically for entities providing support to terrorism.


Comment on this item

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

Click here to see the top 25 recent comments.