"hardline" interpretation?
Reader comment on item: Jihadists to Syrian Christians: Convert to Islam or Die
Submitted by Ron Thompson, Aug 10, 2013 18:06
My only comment on this otherwise informative article is the use of that adjective "hardline". Does Mr Rossomando mean to say that there is some mainline interpretation of the Koran, or the words and spirit of Mohammed, that is NOT hardline? My own study and pondering of "radical", "fundamentalist", "Islamist' or "hardline" Islam leads me to the conclusion that all those adjectives are superfluous. The jihadists in Syria, however violent, seem to be simply Good Muslims, behaving exactly as the Koran prescribes, and as the "Prophet' would approve and admire. It is any Muslims who are appalled by such behavior who are falling away from Islam, and are therefore Bad Muslims, if also decent human beings.
Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.
More Reader Comments
Title | By | Date |
⇒ "hardline" interpretation? |
Ron Thompson |