Sedition vs. Free Speech
Reader comment on item: Hizb Ut-Tahrir: Shariah Takes Precedence over U.S. Constitution
in response to reader comment: SEDITION

Submitted by Matt Vititoe, Jul 20, 2009 15:29

Our government - if it upholds our Constitutional principles - must strike a tough balance between prosecuting seditious acts and protecting our Right of Free Speech. What is worse, listening to others talk about getting rid of our Constitution or not being able to disagree with the government and express it freely?

It's a tough issue. Even our Founding Fathers disagreed as to how or whether to regulate speech. The first Alien and Sedition Acts were enacted shortly after the U.S. became a nation. In 1798, President John Adams signed the Alien and Sedition Acts into law, but just 3 years later, Thomas Jefferson let them expire under his presidency. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition. I wonder why?

Not all speech is protected, yet neither is every protest against governmental policy sedition (See Clear and Present Danger test in Schenk v. US, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_and_present_danger). We have a social responsibility to promote free speech, even when it includes speech or ideas that we find offensive or shocking. (See Lee Bolinger, Free Speech and Tolerance, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech) Sometimes something will shock and offend us, but we know in the back of our minds that it will not have to endure it for long. Perhaps it's a bad idea, or just someone shooting off at the mouth. We can choose to ignore those things or better yet to focus on those things that really matter in our lives. This personal regulation - if you want to call it that - is perhaps more effective because it reflects personal choice.

If we forgo personal regulation and leave it up to the government, the government might not always have our best interests at heart. It might, for example, choose to limit free speech in an effort to protect the citizenry from threats both near and abroad like it did when it tried to regulate speech related to communism, pornography, and terrorism. Just look at how "anti-terrorism" laws, which started out to protect us from threats abroad like fundamentalist Islam, have gradually grown to include many other acts which bear no real resemblence to terrorism.

Once we neglect our collective social responsibility to protect and promote free speech in favor of governmental regulation of speech, where do we draw the line? Perhaps more importantly, if we do want to draw a line...if we do feel that the government has overstepped its bounds...how do we voice our disfavor if we cannot speak out against the very government we created?

I respectfully submit this for your thoughts.

Sincerely,

Matt Vititoe

I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death yoru right to say it. - Evelyn Beatrice Hall


Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

  • Submit a comment on this item
  • More Reader Comments

    Title By Date

    The History is the gurus [126 words]

    Muhammed 

    Sep 8, 2012 06:41

    i am a muslim american [167 words]

    mohammed abu jasim 

    Oct 16, 2010 15:39

    americans just dont get it [93 words]

    John 

    Jul 27, 2009 23:51

    the problem with this website. [200 words]

    matt jones 

    Jul 22, 2009 23:19

    Comment on "Constitutional Right to Speak"... [127 words]

    Bob 

    Jul 22, 2009 18:54

    No one is talking about this on the national news [34 words]

     

    Jul 22, 2009 13:08

    My favorite part [19 words]

     

    Jul 21, 2009 13:06

    Thank God for the Constitution and protected speech. [89 words]

    Rich 

    Jul 21, 2009 10:01

    Why isnt the DHS picking up these loons on the way out? [23 words]

    John 

    Jul 21, 2009 09:34

    1st Ammendment [8 words]

    Don't Tread 

    Jul 21, 2009 06:55

      RE: Jihad waged in the courts [42 words]

    thomaspaine 

    Jul 21, 2009 15:31

    Keep on talking and exposing [60 words]

    daniel 

    Jul 21, 2009 05:56

    wake up america [43 words]

     

    Jul 21, 2009 05:31

    Iran not Authentic Islamic Republic? [105 words]

    BL 

    Jul 20, 2009 23:17

    Deport them all... [75 words]

    American Patriot 

    Jul 20, 2009 21:55

      Fellow Protestor [85 words]

    DanlF 

    Jul 21, 2009 17:36

    Keep them in the open. [64 words]

     

    Jul 20, 2009 19:46

    I wish they did these types of conferences more often [130 words]

    TruthTube.Tv 

    Jul 20, 2009 19:41

    ENEMY WITHIN [18 words]

    MERILYN 

    Jul 20, 2009 19:30

    Freedom of Speech [168 words]

    Robert 

    Jul 20, 2009 18:12

      were it not for the Constitution [66 words]

    Sandi 

    Jul 21, 2009 01:36

    sex on the brain [163 words]

    jim 

    Jul 20, 2009 18:05

    The beginning of the end! [89 words]

    Robert 

    Jul 20, 2009 17:59

    The Enemy Within...Sedition... [112 words]

    Chad 

    Jul 20, 2009 17:51

    This is sick [33 words]

    JB 

    Jul 20, 2009 16:06

    Throw these people out of our country. [36 words]

     

    Jul 20, 2009 14:42

    I especially like the part where they say... [36 words]

     

    Jul 20, 2009 14:34

    SEDITION [5 words]

     

    Jul 20, 2009 14:13

      ⇒ Sedition vs. Free Speech [438 words]

    Matt Vititoe 

    Jul 20, 2009 15:29

    Change [34 words]

    Stukaman 

    Jul 20, 2009 11:57

    100% accurate [100 words]

    russ 

    Jul 20, 2009 11:01

      The US Constitution used as a piece of TP by HT [168 words]

    Foreign Born 

    Jul 20, 2009 21:00

    "it would shred the United States Constitution" -- unfortunately whether you've noticed or not, Americans have been doing a pretty good job of that themselves already. [7 words]

    Tony 

    Jul 20, 2009 10:52

    Shariah Conference [34 words]

    arch angel 

    Jul 20, 2009 10:32

      Shariah Conference [69 words]

     

    Jul 20, 2009 15:56

    Right under our noses [148 words]

    Rebecca Moulds 

    Jul 20, 2009 10:07

    The real agenda of CAIR/ISNA/Etc. [43 words]

    Mira 

    Jul 20, 2009 09:55

    Comment on Hizb Ut-Tahrir: Shariah Takes Precedence over U.S. Constitution

    Mark my comment as a response to Sedition vs. Free Speech by Matt Vititoe

    Email me if someone replies to my comment

    Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

    Click here to see the top 25 recent comments.