Sen. Burr (RINO-NC) will not hold hearings inb the Muslim Brotherhood! WHY?
Reader comment on item: Expert on Radical Islam Fired from Pentagon

Submitted by Frank Livingston, Aug 23, 2015 08:39

Democrats ignore our enemy! The RINO/GOP leadership/followers in the Republican Party refuse to hold hearings on our enemy! The useless media ignore our enemy! Here is an example: I have been trying since 2008 to get Sen. Burr (RINO-NC) and other politicians to request hearings on the removal of our subject matter expert (SME) on Shariah/Islamic law, Stephen Coughlin, DoD/JCS during Bush administration simply because an Islamist, a Muslim, Hersham Islam complained to "Gullible" Gordon England about the speeches Coughlin had been making and the analysis he wrote for the Holy Land Foundation trial in 2008.

Hesham Islam, a Muslim was a personal aide to deputy Defense secretary Gordon England and complained that Coughlin was a "Christian zealot with a pen" during a meeting, a slur rejected by Mr. Coughlin's supporters. Coughlin was telling hard facts that could save military lives and help us win the war against jihadists. Hersham Islam protested Coughlin's research made a connection between Islamic law and terror.

On February 10, 2010 I received a call from Sen. Burr's then chief of staff Chris Joyner who is now the staff director of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in which RINO Burr is the chairman! I asked him if Sen. Burr would request hearings by the Senate Armed Service Committee Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of which he was a member and I was told NO, it would not happen. When I asked why, he just repeated, NO, it would not happen!

Stephen Coughlin is warning us is anyone listening? Who is Stephen Coughlin you ask?

Stephen Coughlin a leading national security advisor and Islamic law expert explains how and why America is losing to jihadists in his new book: "Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of the Jihad".

On page #12 Coughlin writes, "I had entered the Intelligence Directorate adhering to the traditional methods of analysis. Soon, however, I discovered that within the division there seemed to be a preference for political correctness over accuracy and for models that were generated not by what the enemy said he was, but on what academics and "cultural advisors" said the enemy needed to be, based on contrived social science theories."
It seemed the enemy was aware of this as well. Forces hostile to the United States in the War on Terror appeared to have successfully calculated that they could win the war by convincing our national security leaders of the immorality of studying and knowing the enemy." (snip)

https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/catastrophic-failure

Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.