Islam and Islamism
Reader comment on item: Guest Column - Radical Islam Exists: Islamism IS the New Totalitarianism

Submitted by Robert Werdine, Feb 14, 2015 20:41

First of all, I would like express high praise to Qanta Ahmed for her courageous outspokenness here on the danger of Islamism as a totalitarian political ideology, and to Steve Emerson and the Investigative Project for Terrorism for publishing Dr. Ahmed. The excellent work that Mr. Emerson has done in exposing and educating the public about the dangers of Radical Islam—long before 9/11—also cannot be praised too highly. As a Muslim-American myself, I deplore the slanders and outrageous attacks that CAIR, ISNA and other Islamist apologist groups have heaped on Mr. Emerson and the IPT. The efforts of the IPT are directed against Islamists, not Muslims or Islam. CAIR and ISNA would do well to observe the difference.

I would, however, like to address myself to the assertions of commenter "Bob." I must emphasize that to read the Qur'an by ripping verses out of their proper context is an unfortunate habit beloved of both violent Islamists as well as those anti-Islam partisans. Both are exploiting the Qur'an for their own purposes.

All of the verses of the Qur'an that enjoin or allow fighting must be read holistically and in relation to one another and surrounding verses. All proscribe qital (fighting) except in cases of self-defense or persecution. This becomes clearer when the verses 2:216, 3:151, 4:74. 8:12, 15 and 8:39 are read in the context of 2:190-193, 4:89-90, 22:39-41, and 60:8-9.

Even Sura 9:5, the infamous "Verse of the Sword" is limited to fighting the mushrikin (the Quraysh pagans of Arabia) only if they violate their treaties with the Muslims and attack them. The same applies to 9:29, another Islamist/jihadist/terrorist favorite.

Also, this statement on verse 3:151:

"This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah')"

This is simply false. It is discussing the battle of Uhud which was with the Meccan pagans, and no one else. In Islam, all Jews and Christians who believe in God, the Day of Judgement, and live virtuous lives go to heaven.

Qur'an Suras 2:256 and 109:2—6 confirm absolute freedom of worship, and forbid forcible conversions:

"There shall be no compulsion in religion: the right way is now distinct from the wrong way. Anyone who denounces the devil and believes in GOD has grasped the strongest bond; one that never breaks. GOD is Hearer, Omniscient." (2:256)

"I do not worship what you worship. Nor do you worship what I worship. Nor will I ever worship what you worship. Nor will you ever worship what I worship. To you is your religion, and to me is my religion." (109:2-6)

Also, Sura 5:48 confirms that all faiths who worship God must do so in their own way:

"For each of you, we have decreed laws and different rites. Had GOD willed, He could have made you one congregation. But He thus puts you to the test through the revelations He has given each of you. You shall compete in righteousness. To GOD is your final destiny—all of you—then He will inform you of everything you had disputed."

Sura 5:69 confirms that all Christians and Jews who obey their scriptures and live righteous lives will go to heaven:

"Surely, those who believe, those who are Jewish, the converts, and the Christians; any of them who (1) believe in GOD and (2) believe in the Last Day, and (3) lead a righteous life, have nothing to fear, nor will they grieve."

This is confirmed in Sura 2:62, 3:199, and 22:17.

Saving Islam from the wretched clutches of Islamism is and will be a formidable task. But with the help of brave anti-Islamist Muslims like Dr. Ahmed we cannot but succeed, God willing. Peace be upon you all, and Allah bless Steve Emerson and IPT!


Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

  • Submit a comment on this item
  • More Reader Comments

    Title By Date

    Radicalization ? Islam 101 [650 words]

    healer 

    Feb 19, 2015 17:22

    "anti-Muslim hate" [18 words]

    Jack Diamond 

    Feb 18, 2015 15:18

    Islam, Islamism, and the difference [2920 words]

    Robert Werdine 

    Feb 17, 2015 23:19

      "anti-Muslim hate" [1355 words]

    Jack Diamond 

    Feb 18, 2015 15:01

    "Islamism" [751 words]

    Jack Diamond 

    Feb 17, 2015 02:05

    ⇒ Islam and Islamism [634 words]

    Robert Werdine 

    Feb 14, 2015 20:41

    No Radical Islam [180 words]

    Abdul 

    Feb 13, 2015 00:21

    Muhammad was an "Islamist" [322 words]

    Jack Diamond 

    Feb 12, 2015 14:08

    Dark side of Islam [532 words]

    Bob 

    Feb 12, 2015 14:06

    Bad and good Islam? [27 words]

    Michael S. 

    Feb 12, 2015 12:28

    Comment on Guest Column - Radical Islam Exists: Islamism IS the New Totalitarianism

    Mark my comment as a response to Islam and Islamism by Robert Werdine

    Email me if someone replies to my comment

    Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

    Click here to see the top 25 recent comments.