Not terrorism? Then how about Treason?
Reader comment on item: Radical U.S. Muslim Group Defames Moderate, Defends Fort Hood Attack

Submitted by Craig in Maine, Nov 28, 2009 12:59

Given the comments:

"Bilal Abdul-Kareem defends Hasan's killing spree as an act against an enemy in a state of war, rather than a criminal or terrorist act."

Looking at Hasan as a fighter in a state of war against America, but being a member of said

American military unit, how about calling it what it is?? ------= TREASON !!!

Read more at: http://www.investigativeproject.org/blog/#1538

Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

  • Submit a comment on this item

    • More Reader Comments

    Title By Date

    Muslim Intellectuals would NEVER defend the Exremists in Islam. Islam is Pure & Simple. [152 words]

    Mu 

    Jan 28, 2010 06:57

    ⇒ Not terrorism? Then how about Treason? [63 words]

    Craig in Maine 

    Nov 28, 2009 12:59

    who's extreme? [165 words]

    Monte44 

    Nov 19, 2009 14:42

    Comment on Radical U.S. Muslim Group Defames Moderate, Defends Fort Hood Attack

    Mark my comment as a response to Not terrorism? Then how about Treason? by Craig in Maine

    Email me if someone replies to my comment

    Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

    Click here to see the top 25 recent comments.