I don't get it?
Reader comment on item: Judge Clears Path for Trial Against French Bank's Hamas Accounts

Submitted by John, Mar 9, 2013 22:24

Ok, if a bank that has clients who are connected to a terrorist organization is found liable for he organizations behavior then shouldn't a country/organization that funds the bulk of United States debt that conducts terrorist acts conveniently labeled as human rights violations also be liable for funding what amounts to terrorism? When the lawyers open up this pandoras box what will happen to the US and its relationship to their current loan sharks, China? What a mess this will become if the New York courts find the banks guilty of inadvertently supporting terrorism!


Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

  • Submit a comment on this item
  • More Reader Comments

    Title By Date

    The banks know! [65 words]

     

    Mar 14, 2013 09:26

    US Banks and Irish Republican Army (IRA) [33 words]

    Andy H 

    Mar 12, 2013 11:54

    Whats there to get? [29 words]

    Fingrinn 

    Mar 10, 2013 21:15

    ⇒ I don't get it? [94 words]

    John 

    Mar 9, 2013 22:24

    Comment on Judge Clears Path for Trial Against French Bank's Hamas Accounts

    Mark my comment as a response to I don't get it? by John

    Email me if someone replies to my comment

    Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

    Click here to see the top 25 recent comments.