IPT: Playing the Role of the Dhimmi?
Reader comment on item: Note to Readers on Tennessean Story

The following IPT quote was taken directly from your article "Note to Readers on Tennessean Story" dated October 25, 2010 and clearly articulates your position pertaining to the ideology of Islam:

"There is a difference between Islam and Islamism – between people's practice of a faith and attempts to mix that faith with a radical political agenda. The IPT exists to combat Islamism and the often violent extremism carried out in its name."

Unfortunately, it is just not true. The ideology of Islam has not been hijacked, twisted, or distorted by political radicals in its name. The totalitarian ideology of Islam is, by its own doctrine and core beliefs, radical, extreme, political, bigoted, racist, hateful, and seeks to dominate and subjugate all non-Muslims (kafirs) under Islamic Sharia law in its quest for world domination.

How is it that IPT has bought into this misguided mainstream Islamic propaganda? Does IPT believe that Islam is a religion of peace too? Does IPT believes that jihad only means an internal spiritual struggle?

IPT's stated position clearly shows that it is playing the role of the dhimmi, and has voluntarily subjugated itself under Islam. To what end...?

UUn
Read more at: http://www.investigativeproject.org/2278/note-to-readers-on-tennessean-story#comment_submit

Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.