FBI Investigating Possible Terror Ties of Fort Hood Suspect
by Steven Emerson
Interview on Fox News
November 9, 2009
http://www.investigativeproject.org/1505/fbi-investigating-possible-terror-ties-of-fort
Multimedia for this itemVideo Recording |
MARTHA MACCULLUM: Alright. There are brand new developments to tell you about on the rampage that we have been covering since it happened at Fort Hood. Fox News is now confirming that Army Major Nidal Hasan is now awake. He survived this. He was shot as you all remember and he was on a ventilator but he is now talking and he is speaking to medical staff. Hasan is suspected of killing 13 people; meanwhile Homeland Security Chairman has been speaking about it to the Chairman of the Homeland Security Committee; I should say Joe Lieberman is speaking about this. He is calling for an investigation into whether the attack was an act of homegrown terrorism. Steve Emerson is the Executive Director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism. Steve, welcome, good to have you here today.
First of all, your thoughts on the investigation and the meaning of the fact that he is now awake and he is speaking. How long would it take-any idea on the protocol for when the FBI can get in there and start questioning him?
STEVE EMERSON: Well as soon as he is cognizant enough, I assume he is going to be charged. At that point he'll be read his rights, and that includes the right to remain silent and be given legal counsel. So the question is whether he is going to waive his rights or not and at what point he'll be charged. I assume that will be done in the next 24-36 hours considering that he is talking to medical personnel right now.
The question about whether he is an Islamic terrorist is a very good one. In fact, I spoke to the ranking Republican Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Pete Hoekstra this morning, who was fuming that the Director of National Intelligence, Dennis Blair, would refuse to give him a briefing about the signals and the activities of Malik Hasan in terms of what could be construed as patterns showing somebody who was an active Islamic extremist prior to carrying out his rampage.
MACCULLUM: You know one of the questions being raised, Steve, and I'm interested in your thoughts on this, is whether or not some intelligence officials may have been keeping an eye on him based on some of these internet postings that are believed to be attributed to him where he talks about suicide bombers, equivocating them with soldiers who throw themselves on grenades to protect their fellow soldiers.
EMERSON: If in fact the intelligence community was not monitoring it, and if intelligence inside the military was not monitoring it, then there was a major dereliction of duty here and I think that heads should roll because those postings; which are as you say, are most likely attributable to Malik Hasan, clearly indicated that he supported suicide bombings, and even made statements himself to colleagues that he supported suicide bombings against U.S. soldiers.
[Crosstalk]
MACCULLUM: I'm just curious what you're take is on this. I only have a minute left but do you think this is an act of terrorism? Is this the kind of thing where someone is working just through the internet, doing their own act of terrorism or is this a crazy who snapped?
EMERSON: I think it is an act of Islamic terrorism. There is no doubt about. I mean, he was an extremist who believed in the need to carry out attacks on U.S. solders. He believed in suicide bombings. He went to the same mosque where one of the suspects of the 9/11 hijackings was the Imam. I think that althogether when you paint the portrait, you have an Islamic terrorist who carried out these killings. Whether in fact he was alone or not, we don't know at this point.
MACCULLUM: So there are going to be hearings led by Senator Joe Lieberman based on this. Steve Emerson, thank you very much.
EMERSON: You're welcome.
Related Topics: Steven Emerson
Reader comments on this item
IPT
Submitted by Dave Sistaro, Nov 10, 2009 01:07
Anyone who has ever read one of Mr.Emerson's books will know that he is a expert on Islamic Jihad. Hw was warning America about this before the WTC bombing and Sept 11th. Why people (Goverment) won't listen to him is beyond me., He should be hired to work in conjunction with the White House but we all know that will never happen.
"calling it right" first time around
Submitted by Patrick Dunleavy, Nov 9, 2009 22:23
Thank you Steve for speaking out on the incident and calling it what it is. I'm reminded of the case of Rashid Baz, aka the Brooklyn Bridge Shooter. In March 1994 after hearing a fiery serman preached at the Islamic Center of Bay Ridge, he went out armed with automatic weapons and opened fire on a van full of hasidic jewish students, killing Ari Halberstam and wounding several others. The authorities at the time refused to call it an Islamic act of terrorism. The District Attorney call it a simple act of "Road Rage" It was not until all the facts were brought out and the relentless pursuit of the Halberstam family that it was declared a terrorist act in December 2000 by the United States Justice Department. It took them over six years to call it what it was. Thanks for calling it right the first time.
Investigative Project on Terrorism
Submitted by Don McGowan, Nov 9, 2009 20:14
I get daily updates online from the IPT and have great respect for Steve Emerson all all he and his associates do in an attempt to make America aware of the potential dangers of Islamic terrorism and Jihad. Steve has sent me some eye-opening books pertaining to Islamic Jihad and they are chilling.
Someone with the devotion of Steve Emerson should be heading Homeland Security rather than a political hack because he is always well aware of what's going on and he's not afraid of Political Correctness, a killing virus that pervades our country and well-meaning society. I'd feel much more safe and secure if he was the head.


